The “Most Destructive Oil Drilling Plan” Yet!
Donald Trump clearly enjoys his superlatives. He proclaimed himself to be “the greatest jobs president that God ever created,” he lauded his hiring of the “best people,” having “the best words,” getting “the biggest crowds,” and so on. It was no surprise, then, when President Trump and Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke proposed a new Draft Five Year Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program pushing for the “largest number of (oil) lease sales in U.S. History.” In fairness to this terrifying description, if the Administration succeeds with their plan as introduced, they would indeed open more than 90% of our coast to new offshore drilling!
The Trump Five-Year Program is being designed to cut short and replace the current Five-Year Program put in place by the Obama Administration. The new proposal would allow oil and gas companies to purchase leases from 2019 to 2024, and would be devastating to coastal ecosystems and economies around the country.
Looking at the map above, you can see that Trump and Zinke see everything as on the table for new oil drilling. This includes Florida, despite a tweet from Interior Secretary, Ryan Zinke, stating that the Sunshine State has been removed from consideration. While Florida may indeed be pulled from the plan at some early stage, a tweet is not a valid legal mechanism for doing anything.
Trump’s Drilling Plan and California
If Trump gets what he wants, this program will bring the first new oil leases offshore California since 1984. Much has changed since then. For one thing, we have all become far more aware of the relationship between carbon emissions and catastrophic climate disruption. We have also developed far more robust and reliable renewable sources of energy, making a transition away from polluting fossil fuels not only possible, but essential. What has not changed is that Big Oil continues to play an outsized role in our political system, in our energy production, and in the creation of unfathomable disasters.
Here along the Central Coast, residents are all too familiar with the risks posed by offshore oil drilling. Starting with the tragic Santa Barbara Oil Spill of 1969 and all the way through 2015’s Refugio Oil Spill, our communities have experienced devastating spill after spill. We know that with oil and accidents, it is never a question of if, but rather when disaster will strike. Unfortunately, of all the Pacific Region currently included in the Trump proposal, there is no question that the Santa Barbara Channel is the most at risk. And because the era of easy oil is over, we know that new leases off our coast will quickly lead to more than just conventional oil drilling and toward fracking and acidizing.
There is too much at stake on our coastline to allow more fracking, acidizing, or other oil drilling technologies. The Santa Barbara Channel is a special place, often referred to as the Galapagos of North America due to its ecological diversity. Not only does the Channel provide excellent opportunities for fisheries, tourism, and other recreation, it also includes the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary and Park, as well as federal and state Marine Protected Areas. This area is an important migratory route and feeding area for endangered blue, humpback, and fin whales, southern sea otters, and many other threatened or endangered species. It is also our home, and the site of some of the most beloved and ecologically important coastal open space left in the country.
Fortunately, President Trump cannot simply wave a wand and open the doors to new drilling. There is a multi-stage process that is required to finalize a new Five-Year Program. Currently, the Administration has released a Draft Proposed Program, which allows 60 days for the public to comment. That will be followed by a Proposed Program and Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS), which will be subject to a 90-day comment period. Then the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) will issue a Proposed Final Program and Final PEIS, which will be submitted to the President and Congress for 60 days before it can be finally adopted.
While there will be several opportunities for people to weigh in with their concerns and objections over the coming months, this Draft Proposed Program period is critically important. This is our best chance to flood (BOEM with our objections and push to have California’s coast removed from the plan.
If you have not yet sent in your comments, please do so today! Visit EDC’s action page where you will see talking points, suggestions, and a link to submit your comments.
While EDC is focused primarily on the Santa Barbara Channel and risks to California’s coast, there is certainly value in speaking out against the overall Program. At a time when climate disruption is already impacting our local communities in multiple ways, including with extended drought and elongated fire seasons, it is essential that we move away from the polluting fossil fuels of the past. And once we succeed in getting our coast removed from this plan, we can take a page from Trump’s book of superlatives, proclaiming this as “the most important coastal protection victory of the 21st century.”
Tags: Acidizing, drilling, Endangered Species, Fracking, offshore oil, Santa Barbara Channel, Trump Administration
Trackback from your site.
Andrea Dransfield
| #
No more environmental degradation! In this day and age, it is inconceivable to even think about putting more oil rigs along the coast. No more pollution! No more carbon emissions! No more money at the expense of our wildlife, environment, and our health.
Reply
find salesperson
| #
What’s up, I wish for to subscribe for this web site to
get latest updates, thus where can i do it please help out.
Reply
mucize 2 aşk izle
| #
Amazing! Its really awesome article, I have got much clear idea about from this article. Kelcie Abby Faires
Reply
Ganobet
| #
Sizler de Bonus ve kampanyalarla dolu bahis deneyimleri yaşamak istiyorsanız Ganobet giriş adresi tam da size göre. Linke tıkla ve vakit kaybetmeden bahis heyecanına başla!
Reply
staljackstaff
| #
When someone is looking for something that is essential to them, they want to be able to access it in as much detail as possible, which is why this particular tunnel rush object is kept in this location.
Reply
Pete Gibson
| #
It is definitely a case not of if, but rather when. This rea should be left alone, it’s too unstable nd the companies are not being help accountable.
Reply
dallas
| #
It makes me so happy to have found this helpful website. It teaches me a lot of interesting things shell shockers
Reply